Expand assumes to the other unchecked slice ops #120762

saethlin · 2024-02-08T00:26:45Z

r? @ghost

saethlin · 2024-02-08T00:34:02Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

bors · 2024-02-08T00:35:13Z

⌛ Trying commit b9947b3 with merge a8aa174...

…<try> Expand assumes to the other unchecked slice ops r? `@ghost`

bors · 2024-02-08T02:02:52Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a8aa174 (a8aa1746af7b61b15a32955c227c47dfb0d7c57f)

rust-timer · 2024-02-08T05:42:58Z

Finished benchmarking commit (a8aa174): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.2%, 0.8%]	12
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.1%, 0.4%]	5
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.4%	[0.2%, 0.8%]	12

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.9%	[0.5%, 10.4%]	5
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.5%	[-4.3%, -2.6%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.1%	[-4.3%, 10.4%]	8

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.2%	[1.2%, 1.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-0.6%, -0.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-6.2%	[-6.2%, -6.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[-0.6%, 1.2%]	2

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.5%]	35
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.1%, 0.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.9%, -0.0%]	31
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.9%, 0.5%]	66

Bootstrap: 662.945s -> 662.852s (-0.01%)
Artifact size: 308.24 MiB -> 308.20 MiB (-0.01%)

saethlin · 2024-02-10T11:19:53Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

…<try> Expand assumes to the other unchecked slice ops r? `@ghost`

bors · 2024-02-10T11:21:02Z

⌛ Trying commit 8063335 with merge 3d763f6...

bors · 2024-02-10T12:48:37Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 3d763f6 (3d763f6f496d0fd5c25aa650565c36c1775499ba)

rust-timer · 2024-02-10T14:43:52Z

Finished benchmarking commit (3d763f6): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.2%, 0.6%]	6
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.4%]	7
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.4%	[0.2%, 0.6%]	6

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	4.3%	[0.4%, 7.3%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-8.0%	[-10.7%, -5.7%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.3%	[-3.3%, -3.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-10.7%, 7.3%]	8

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.7%]	45
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.1%]	7
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-1.1%, -0.0%]	17
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.1%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-1.1%, 0.7%]	62

Bootstrap: 666.007s -> 668.01s (0.30%)
Artifact size: 308.04 MiB -> 307.93 MiB (-0.04%)

saethlin · 2024-02-14T04:46:46Z

Now with LLVM 18!
@bors try @rust-timer queue

bors · 2024-02-14T04:47:55Z

⌛ Trying commit 2c76737 with merge 61c0f10...

…<try> Expand assumes to the other unchecked slice ops r? `@ghost`

bors · 2024-02-14T06:15:55Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 61c0f10 (61c0f10e6445b193248a77f2cf0bd59fead8bfd3)

bors · 2024-09-12T05:54:36Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: f693f6c (f693f6c00252e3709f0c1c7c77263c74f31a605a)

rust-timer · 2024-09-12T10:01:56Z

Finished benchmarking commit (f693f6c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 1.4%]	23
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.4%]	5
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[-0.2%, 1.4%]	24

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.3%, secondary 3.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.6%	[2.1%, 3.1%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[2.1%, 3.7%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-7.1%	[-8.6%, -5.7%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.3%	[-8.6%, 3.1%]	4

Cycles

Results (primary 1.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.6%	[1.6%, 1.6%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.6%	[1.6%, 1.6%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%, secondary -0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.3%]	19
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.2%, -0.0%]	10
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.0%]	36
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.0%	[-0.2%, 0.3%]	29

Bootstrap: 756.901s -> 758.744s (0.24%)
Artifact size: 341.35 MiB -> 341.32 MiB (-0.01%)

saethlin · 2025-05-03T19:31:47Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

…<try> Expand assumes to the other unchecked slice ops r? `@ghost`

bors · 2025-05-03T19:33:01Z

⌛ Trying commit 1f4a2bc with merge 17cacb7...

bors · 2025-05-03T21:41:30Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 17cacb7 (17cacb7eb83a60d51e28aa046469b4b2b2694d44)

rust-timer · 2025-05-03T23:18:13Z

Finished benchmarking commit (17cacb7): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.7%	[0.2%, 3.0%]	13
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.4%	[0.2%, 0.5%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	7
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[-0.3%, 3.0%]	20

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.7%, secondary -1.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.8%	[0.7%, 7.1%]	6
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-7.6%, -0.4%]	31
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.9%	[-1.9%, -1.9%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-7.6%, 7.1%]	37

Cycles

Results (primary -0.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.8%	[0.4%, 3.2%]	11
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-1.4%, -0.4%]	32
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-1.4%, 3.2%]	43

Binary size

Results (primary 0.2%, secondary -0.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.0%, 1.2%]	9
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.4%, -0.0%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	10
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[-0.4%, 1.2%]	13

Bootstrap: 768.722s -> 771.143s (0.31%)
Artifact size: 365.56 MiB -> 365.51 MiB (-0.01%)

saethlin · 2025-10-06T01:15:16Z

There's been a new LLVM release since my last perf run
@bors try @rust-timer queue

Expand assumes to the other unchecked slice ops

rust-bors · 2025-10-06T03:26:43Z

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: d2ceee7 (d2ceee7e2eba168123d21883cddb60e573d51e85, parent: 839222065a44ac21c15df68ed2f2f3c0127b0b8e)

rust-timer · 2025-10-06T04:36:07Z

Finished benchmarking commit (d2ceee7): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.5%	[0.3%, 0.6%]	8
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.1%, 0.5%]	5
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.5%, -0.2%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-1.0%, -0.0%]	14
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[-0.5%, 0.6%]	13

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.7%, secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.7%	[0.8%, 2.4%]	5
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.7%	[-4.8%, -1.0%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.1%	[-6.9%, -0.8%]	15
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.7%	[-4.8%, -1.0%]	4

Cycles

Results (primary 2.0%, secondary 0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.0%	[2.0%, 2.0%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.0%	[2.2%, 4.2%]	5
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.9%	[-4.8%, -1.2%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.0%	[2.0%, 2.0%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%, secondary -0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.3%]	11
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.3%, -0.0%]	10
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.0%	[-0.3%, 0.3%]	21

Bootstrap: 471.555s -> 472.443s (0.19%)
Artifact size: 388.38 MiB -> 388.01 MiB (-0.10%)

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 8, 2024

saethlin force-pushed the assume-in-get-unchecked branch from 6d8cb55 to b9947b3 Compare February 8, 2024 00:33